Charlie's profile-=-= 无为空间,虚幻世界 -=-=PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help
    July 23

    真真假假登月骗局

    昨天是NASA的登月40周年纪念。但是在很多人看来,登月不过是美国政府导演的一场骗局而以。先不说网上盛行的几大登月画面漏洞,比如飘扬的旗帜,没有星星的天空等,就从NASA本身来说,就是疑点重重。首先是登月的原始影像资料。如此重要的东西,NASA居然丢的一干二净,一点不剩。据说当年的磁盘和磁带已经被消磁重新使用了。难道NASA的管理混乱到如此地步,连归档都做不好?第二点是土星V号运载火箭。这个系列的火箭为登月立下了汗马功劳,主要在于它是当时也是目前为止世界上推力最大的火箭。当时俄罗斯之所以没有成功登月,一个重要的原因就是无法研制出如此推力巨大的火箭,以至于没有办法把他们的登月舱送到月球上。应该说土星V系列火箭是美国的骄傲,即使后来美国政府因为成本过大而不再使用该火箭,但是它的技术和设计还是应该留下来的。然而就是在这个问题上,NASA又一次管理混乱,居然丢失了火箭的设计图纸。简直让人无法理解。最简单的解释就是该火箭根本不存在,因此登月也就是一场骗局了。

    不过,从另外一个角度看,也可能是NASA为了保护机密而对外宣称丢失的。最初对NASA登月提出疑点的是俄罗斯人。美俄处在战略竞争关系,俄罗斯人很可能想通过怀疑NASA的方式,引诱NASA进行更多的辩解,从而透漏出更多的登月机密。毕竟在这个地球上,号称登上月球的只有美国人,打探他们的技术也就在情理之中了。NASA面对这种情况,如果提供更多的信息去为自己辩护,很有可能泄露机密,从而在现在的登月大战中错失先机。所以干脆就谎称丢失,一了百了。

    不过以上这些总归只是猜测,究竟美国人有没有成功登月,只能等待中国嫦娥奔月计划实施后,才见分晓。

    Comments

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://efly21.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C1F665652CC34DA7!705.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None